The who , what , where and why of waking to fire alarms : a review
نویسندگان
چکیده
This review brings together several different strands of research: (i) The sleep arousal literature pertaining to auditory arousal thresholds (AAT), (ii) studies on factors affecting responsiveness to auditory signals during sleep, (iii) literature on responsiveness to smoke detector alarms during sleep and (iv) research on fire fatality statistics and victim characteristics. The review discusses the influence of age, sleep alarms clearly suggest that an unimpaired sleeping adult will awaken quickly to a 55-60 dBA alarm (such as with a hallway installation), while the AAT literature suggests higher thresholds (most likely due to differences in signal frequency). However, it is argued that the level required to wake such adults under the ideal circumstances of an experimental situation should not be the minimum standard for pillow audibility. Such a level is unlikely to arouse children, those on sleep inducing medication, people with high frequency hearing loss (as may occur with age), those who are sleep deprived or those under the influence of alcohol or marijuana. The responsiveness of the unimpaired adults tested is not generalisable to the responsiveness of the people most likely to be the victims of fire occurring while they are asleep (the very young, elderly, intoxicated, or sick). The sound intensity of the alarm at the pillow should have the highest chance of arousing those most at risk of dying. It is therefore recommended that smoke detector alarms be installed in the bedrooms themselves such that the signal intensity is at the maximum level tolerable to the human ear, that is approximately 90 dBA. It is well documented that although more fires are reported during the daylight hours than at night (eg 65.8% of home structure fires occurred between 8 am and 8pm 1), those at night pose more threat to life. Statistics consistently show that about half of all residential fire deaths occur in the night hours. 1-7 Coronial reports on 114 fire fatalities 8 noted that 81% of the fatal fires were at night (8pm to 8am) and in those 86% of victims were sleeping. Moreover, in fires during the day, 31% of the victims were actually sleeping. Thus being asleep is a much stronger risk factor for dying in a fire than time of day. Three quarters of those who were asleep did not move from the room in which they were originally located, suggesting that waking either did not occur or occurred too late to …
منابع مشابه
Sleep and Fire: Who is at risk and can the risk be reduced?
While sleep is clearly a major risk factor for dying in a fire, in this review it is argued that in most fire fatalities during the sleeping period additional risk factors are also operating. This view is consistent with the data from empirical sleep studies and smoke alarms where most (but not all) adults tested will awaken to a signal reaching the pillow at 75 dBA. However, research suggests ...
متن کاملPsychological consequences of firefighters' working conditions: A Qualitative Study
Introduction: A high-risk job, firefighting involves a wide range of tasks. Given the difficult nature of the job with all the responsibilities included, and in addition to the impending physical injuries, firefighters undergo several emergencies which can endanger their psychological health. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the psychological consequences of firefighter...
متن کاملOptimizing Emergency Awakening to Audible Smoke Alarms: An Update
OBJECTIVE This review examines research on arousal from sleep in an emergency. It considers whether the current smoke alarm signal is optimal for waking those most at risk of dying in a fire and, if not, how it may be improved. BACKGROUND The fire fatality rate during the sleeping period is approximately three times greater than at other times. METHOD Four key areas are reviewed: (a) the ch...
متن کاملThe Why, Who, What, How, and When of Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organizations: A Response to Recent Commentaries
متن کامل
Using the Taxonomy and the Metrics: What to Study When and Why; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”
Dukhanin and colleagues’ taxonomy of metrics for patient engagement at the organizational and system levels has great potential for supporting more careful and useful evaluations of this ever-growing phenomenon. This commentary highlights the central importance to the taxonomy of metrics assessing the extent of meaningful participation in decision-making by patients, consumers and community mem...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009